|
In
the ideal case, a carbon nanotube consists of either one cylindrical
graphene sheet (single-wall nanotube, SWNT) or of several nested cylinders
with an interlayer spacing of 0.34 – 0.36 nm that is
close to the typical spacing of turbostratic graphite (multiwall nanotube,
MWNT).
There
are many possibilities to form a cylinder with a graphene sheet: the most
simple way of visualizing this is to use a "de Heer abacus":

A "de Heer" abacus: to
realize a (n,m) tube, move n times a1 and m times a2 from the origin to
get to point (n,m) and roll-up the sheet so that the two points coincide...
Basically,
one can roll up the sheet
along one of the symmetry axis: this gives either a zig-zag tube or an armchair tube. It is also possible to roll up
the sheet in a direction that differs from a symmetry axis: one obtains a
chiral nanotube, in which the equivalent atoms of each unit
cell are aligned on a spiral. Besides the chiral angle, the circumference
of the cylinder can also be varied. In general, the whole family of
nanotubes is classified as zigzag, armchair, and chiral tubes of different
diameters:

Models
of different singlewall nanotubes (generated with Mathematica on the left,
and taken from Saito
et al., APL 60, 2204 (1992) on
the right).
You
can also generate your own nanotube models with the software Mathematica 4.0 using a notebook by
Brandbyge that allows one to draw the structure as well as to compute the
energy bands of SWNTs (get it here).
This
diversity of possible configurations is indeed found in practice, and no
particular type is preferentially formed. The lengths of SWNTs and MWNTs are usually well over 1 µm
and diameters range from ~1 nm (for SWNTs) to ~50 nm (for MWNTs).
Pristine SWNTs are usually closed at both ends by fullerene-like
halfspheres that contain both pentagons and hexagons . As shown in the electron microscopy images
below, a SWNT has a well-defined spherical tip, whereas the shape of a
MWNT cap is more
polyhedral than spherical. An open MWNT, as the name implies, doesn't have
a cap and the ends of the graphene
layers and the internal cavity of the tube are exposed.

Transmission
electron microsopy (TEM) pictures of the ends
of different nanotubes. Each black line corresponds to one
graphene sheet viewed edge-on.
Defects
in the hexagonal lattice are usually present in the form of pentagons and
heptagons. Pentagons produce a positive curvature of the graphene layer
and are mostly found at the cap.
Heptagons give raise to a negative curvature of the tube wall. Defects consisting of several pentagons and/or heptagons have
also been observed. A simple model indicates that the diameter and/or
chirality of the tube is changed from one side of the defect to the other. Such an arrangement forms therefore a link between two different
tubes and is accordingly called a junction.

Junction between two SWNTs. Reproduced
from Chico et al., PRL 76, 971 (1996).
The
electronic properties of SWNTs have been studied in a large number of
theoretical works. All models show that the electronic properties vary in a
predictable way from metallic to semiconducting with diameter and
chirality. This is due to the very peculiar band structure of graphene and
is absent in systems that can be described with usual free electron theory.
Graphene
is a zero-gap semiconductor with
Basically, all armchair tubes are metallic. One out of three
zigzag and chiral tubes show a small very small bandgap due to the
curvature of the graphene sheet, while all other tubes are semi-conducting
with a bandgap
that scales approximately with the inverse of the tube radius. Bandgaps of
0.4 – 1 eV can be expected for SWNTs (corresponding to
diameters between 0.6 and 1.6 nm).

On the left: bandstructure of the
conduction band of graphene, which crosses the Fermi level at the edges of
the Brillouin zone.
On the right: predicted band-gap as a function of SWNT radius, reproduced
from Kane
and Mele, PRL 78, 1932 (1997).
These
theoretical predictions made in 1992 were actually confirmed in 1998 by
scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Numerous conductivity experiments on SWNTs and MWNTs allowed to
gain additional informations. At low temperatures, SWNTs behave as coherent quantum wires where
the conduction occurs through discrete electron states over large
distances. Transport measurements revealed that metallic SWNTs show
extremely long coherence lengths. MWNTs show also these effects in spite of their larger diameter
and multiple shells.
On-line tutorial on nanotubes (only in french at the moment)
Essential links
David Tomanek:
THE nanotube site
P.J.F. Harris's
nanotube site
Vincent
Meunier: nanotubes on the web
Some review articles
T. W. Ebbesen, Physics Today
1996; 49: 26.
P. M. Ajayan and T. W. Ebbesen,
Reports on Progress in Physics 1997; 60: 1025.
B.
I. Yakobson and R.E. Smalley, American Scientist 1997; 85: 324.
C.
Dekker, Physics Today 1999; 52: 22.
Physics
World June 2000 issue on carbon nanotubes
Some books
Dresselhaus M. S., Dresselhaus
G., Eklund P. C., Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. New York:
Academic Press, 1996.
Ebbesen T. W., Carbon nanotubes:
preparation and properties. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997.
Tanaka K., Yamabe T., Fukui K.,
The science and technology of carbon nanotubes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999.
    
|