NT basics

 

Stucture    

Electronic   
properties 

More
info?

Stucture

In the ideal case, a carbon nanotube consists of either one cylindrical graphene sheet (single-wall nanotube, SWNT) or of several nested cylinders with an interlayer spacing of 0.34 – 0.36 nm that is close to the typical spacing of turbostratic graphite (multiwall nanotube, MWNT). 

There are many possibilities to form a cylinder with a graphene sheet: the most simple way of visualizing this is to use a "de Heer abacus":

A "de Heer" abacus: to realize a (n,m) tube, move n times a1 and m times a2 from the origin to get to point (n,m) and roll-up the sheet so that the two points coincide...

Basically, one can roll up the sheet along one of the symmetry axis: this gives either a zig-zag tube or an armchair tube. It is also possible to roll up the sheet in a direction that differs from a symmetry axis: one obtains a chiral nanotube, in which the equivalent atoms of each unit cell are aligned on a spiral. Besides the chiral angle, the circumference of the cylinder can also be varied. In general, the whole family of nanotubes is classified as zigzag, armchair, and chiral tubes of different diameters:

Models of different singlewall nanotubes (generated with Mathematica on the left, and taken from Saito et al., APL 60, 2204 (1992) on the right).

You can also generate your own nanotube models with the software Mathematica 4.0 using a notebook by Brandbyge that allows one to draw the structure as well as to compute the energy bands of SWNTs (get it here).

This diversity of possible configurations is indeed found in practice, and no particular type is preferentially formed. The lengths of SWNTs and MWNTs are usually well over 1 µm and diameters range from ~1 nm (for SWNTs) to ~50 nm (for MWNTs). Pristine SWNTs are usually closed at both ends by fullerene-like halfspheres that contain both pentagons and hexagons . As shown in the electron microscopy images below, a SWNT has a well-defined spherical tip, whereas the shape of a MWNT cap is more polyhedral than spherical. An open MWNT, as the name implies, doesn't have a cap and the ends of the graphene layers and the internal cavity of the tube are exposed.  

Transmission electron microsopy (TEM) pictures of the ends 
of different nanotubes. Each black line corresponds to one 
graphene sheet viewed edge-on.

Defects in the hexagonal lattice are usually present in the form of pentagons and heptagons. Pentagons produce a positive curvature of the graphene layer and are mostly found at the cap. Heptagons give raise to a negative curvature of the tube wall. Defects consisting of several pentagons and/or heptagons have also been observed. A simple model indicates that the diameter and/or chirality of the tube is changed from one side of the defect to the other. Such an arrangement forms therefore a link between two different tubes and is accordingly called a junction.

Junction between two SWNTs. Reproduced from Chico et al., PRL 76, 971 (1996).

 

Electronic properties

The electronic properties of SWNTs have been studied in a large number of theoretical works. All models show that the electronic properties vary in a predictable way from metallic to semiconducting with diameter and chirality. This is due to the very peculiar band structure of graphene and is absent in systems that can be described with usual free electron theory. 

Graphene is a zero-gap semiconductor with

Basically, all armchair tubes are metallic. One out of three zigzag and chiral tubes show a small very small bandgap due to the curvature of the graphene sheet, while all other tubes are semi-conducting with a bandgap that scales approximately with the inverse of the tube radius. Bandgaps of 0.4 – 1 eV can be expected for SWNTs (corresponding to diameters between 0.6 and 1.6 nm).

 

On the left: bandstructure of the conduction band of graphene, which crosses the Fermi level at the edges of the Brillouin zone. 
On the right: predicted band-gap as a function of SWNT radius, reproduced from Kane and Mele, PRL 78, 1932 (1997)
.

These theoretical predictions made in 1992 were actually confirmed in 1998 by scanning tunneling spectroscopy. Numerous conductivity experiments on SWNTs and MWNTs allowed to gain additional informations. At low temperatures, SWNTs behave as coherent quantum wires where the conduction occurs through discrete electron states over large distances. Transport measurements revealed that metallic SWNTs show extremely long coherence lengths. MWNTs show also these effects in spite of their larger diameter and multiple shells.

More informations

On-line tutorial on nanotubes (only in french at the moment)

Essential links

David Tomanek: THE nanotube site

P.J.F. Harris's nanotube site  

Vincent Meunier: nanotubes on the web

Some review articles

T. W. Ebbesen, Physics Today 1996; 49: 26.

P. M. Ajayan and T. W. Ebbesen, Reports on Progress in Physics 1997; 60: 1025.

B. I. Yakobson and R.E. Smalley, American Scientist 1997; 85: 324.

C. Dekker,  Physics Today 1999; 52: 22.

Physics World June 2000 issue on carbon nanotubes

Some books

Dresselhaus M. S., Dresselhaus G., Eklund P. C., Science of fullerenes and carbon nanotubes. New York: Academic Press, 1996.

Ebbesen T. W., Carbon nanotubes: preparation and properties. Boca Raton: CRC Press, 1997.

Tanaka K., Yamabe T., Fukui K., The science and technology of carbon nanotubes. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1999.